ccn4 protein (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Ccn4 Protein, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 28 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ccn4 protein/product/R&D Systems
Average 91 stars, based on 28 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Data-driven learning how oncogenic gene expression locally alters heterocellular networks"
Article Title: Data-driven learning how oncogenic gene expression locally alters heterocellular networks
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29636-3
Figure Legend Snippet: Digital cytometry deconvolutes a bulk transcriptomic profile using gene signatures that correspond to different stromal, malignant, and immune cell types. The results estimate the prevalence of the different cell types within the tissue sample, that is the digital cytometry features. By using bulk transcriptomic profiles of defined patient populations, underlying variation in the inferred cellular composition coupled with features associated with a patient sample, such as over-expression of a secreted gene product by malignant cells, can be used to estimate how the heterocellular network is impacted by a genetic alteration intrinsic to the malignant cell using Bayesian Network inference. To illustrate the approach, we focused on malignant cell expression of Cell Communication Network factor 4 (CCN4), a secreted matricellular protein. The resulting directed acyclic graph represents the collective conditional independence among the modeled features, or nodes, of the network.
Techniques Used: Cytometry, Over Expression, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: The nodes of the graph represent features, such as CCN4 gene expression (rectangle), sample attribute (hexagon), or the prevalence of a particular cell type/state (oval). The edges represent inferred causal relationships among the nodes. The black lines with arrow heads represent a positive causal relation while red lines with horizontal bars represent a negative or inhibitory causal relation, where the extent of influence of the parental node is annotated by the number beside the edge. The number included within the node symbol represents the average normalized value of the digital cytometry feature within the dataset with values of all of the parental nodes set to zero. The width of the edge is proportional to the posterior probability of inclusion into the DAG.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: A The percentage of live CD45+ cells isolated from tumors generated by inoculating s.c. with WT (red) and CCN4 KO (blue) variants of B16F0 (o and x’s) and YUMM1.7 (□ and +’s) cells, where the log-linear trends are highlighted by dotted lines. CD45+ values were obtained from three different antibody panels that quantified T cells, B/NK cells, and myeloid cells in TIL isolates from each mouse. B A comparison of the ratio of NK cells (black), CD8+ T cells (red), CD4+ T cells (blue), and B cells (green) to live CD45+ TILs in s.c. tumors generated using WT B16F0 and YUMM1.7 cells (mean ± s.d.). C The difference in the mean prevalence of the infiltrating immune cell types was compared when CCN4 is present (WT) versus absent (CCN4 KO) as predicted by digital cytometry from the BRCA (dark gray) and SKCM (light gray) datasets and as observed experimentally using the B16F0 (red) and YUMM1.7 (black) mouse models. D TIL comparison upon CCN4 KO in B16F0 and YUMM1.7 mouse models stratified by NK cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and B cells (top to bottom) ( n = 7 biologically independent animals for YUMM1.7 and n = 4 biologically independent animals for B16F0 variants and mean ± s.d.). p -values calculated between WT and CCN4 KO pairs using two-sided Student’s t test.
Techniques Used: Isolation, Generated, Comparison, Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: A A comparison of the ratio of CD11c- (black) and CD11c+ (gray) macrophages, Dendritic cells (yellow), CD11c+ MDSC (green), MDSC (blue), and Neutrophils (red) to live CD45+ TILs in s.c. tumors generated using WT B16F0 and YUMM1.7 cells (mean ± s.d.). B The difference in prevalence of the myeloid cell types was compared when CCN4 is present (WT) versus absent (CCN4 KO) as predicted by digital cytometry of the BRCA (dark gray) and SKCM (light gray) data sets and as observed experimentally using the B16F0 (red) and YUMM1.7 (black) mouse models. Macrophages are the only myeloid cell subset inferred from the BRCA and SKCM datasets and are assumed to be related to CD11c+ macrophages in mouse models. C A representative scatter plot of GR1 versus CD11c expression in gated live CD45+ CD11b+ TILs obtained from WT (top) and CCN4 KO (bottom) YUMM1.7 tumors. D – F TIL comparison upon CCN4 KO in B16F0 and YUMM1.7 mouse models stratified by myeloid-derived suppressor cell subsets ( D : MDSC (top) and CD11c+ MDSC (bottom)) and other myeloid cell subsets ( E : CD11c- (top) and CD11c+ (bottom) macrophages, F : neutrophils (top) and dendritic cells (bottom)) ( n = 7 biologically independent animals for YUMM1.7 and n = 4 biologically independent animals for B16F0 variants and mean ± s.d.). p -values calculated between WT and CCN4 KO variants using two-sided Student’s t test.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Generated, Cytometry, Expressing, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A Expression of genes for transcription factors (left panel - Snai1: red triangle, Snai2: blue diamond, Zeb1: black circle, and Zeb2: gray square) and adhesion proteins (right panel - Cdh1: blue triangle, Cdh2: black circle, Fn1: red square) associated with the epithelial-mesenchymal transition were assayed as a function of time following addition of rmCCN4 to CCN4 KO YUMM1.7 (top row) and CCN4 KO B16F0 cells (bottom row). Colored asterisks indicate whether gene at a particular time point was significantly different than untreated cells, where n = 3 biological independent samples. B The distribution in cell trace staining among live CD4 + (left panel) and CD8 + (right panel) T cells stimulated with α CD3/ α CD28 (AP beads) alone or in the presence of media conditioned by WT B16F0 cells (AP beads + WT TCM), media conditioned by CCN4 KO B16F0 cells (AP beads + CCN4 KO TCM), or with 10 ng/ml of recombinant mouse CCN4 (AP beads + rCCN4). The distribution in the corresponding unstimulated cells (gray) are shown at the bottom. The colored vertical lines indicate the predicted dilution of cell trace staining in each generation based on the unstimulated controls. C Bivariate projection of the weights of genes within the resting (y-axis) and activated (x-axis) NK cell signatures. D Using spleens from C57BL/6 mice that were challenged with YUMM1.7 cells, isolated CD8+ T cells were assayed by in vitro ELISpot for IFN γ expression using variants of the YUMM1.7 cell line as targets (CCN4 KO YUMM1.7 with a blank inducible expression vector and CCN4 KO YUMM1.7 with a CCN4 inducible expression vector). To induce CCN4 expression, these YUMM1.7 variants were also cultured in the absence (−) or presence of doxycycline (+) and quantified following 24 h co-culture. Statistical significance between WT and CCN4 KO variants was assessed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison ad hoc post-test, where n = 6 biologically independent samples. Results summarized as mean ± s.d.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Staining, Recombinant, Isolation, In Vitro, Enzyme-linked Immunospot, Plasmid Preparation, Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay, Comparison


